Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
Personal Best Nutrition
  Latest info can be found on the YaBB Chat and Support Community.
  HomeHelpSearchLoginRegister  
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Want Speed? Slow Down! by Dr. Philip Maffetone (Read 8415 times)
Brian Shea
Senior Member
****
Offline


Forum Operator
Posts: 392

Gender: male
Want Speed? Slow Down! by Dr. Philip Maffetone
Jul 3rd, 2004, 8:35pm
 
Want speed? Slow down!
by Dr. Philip Maffetone


A heart rate monitor is still an underrated, misunderstood training companion. Many of today's runners have monitors but don't get their money's worth from them. Heart rate monitors are really just biofeedback units. But without interpretation of the data they provide, their true benefits cannot be realized. Dorland's Medical Dictionary defines biofeedback as "the process of providing visual or auditory evidence to a person of the status of body function so that you may exert control over that function." As students in the 1970s involved in a biofeedback research project, we measured responses in human subjects to various physiological inputs; sounds, visual effects, and a variety of physical stimulation, including activity. The observed reactions were evaluated by measuring temperature, sweating, and heart rate.

It became evident that using the heart rate to objectively measure body function was simple, accurate, and useful. And its application in sports was obvious. For me, this was the beginning of a long process of using heart monitors with athletes.

By the early 1980s, I was using monitors for three important running applications:
•      Training
•      Self-assessment
•      Racing

Training
The use of a heart rate monitor for effective training entails two important aspects. The first is that all endurance athletes must build a good aerobic base, a notion that famed running coach Arthur Lydiard promoted decades ago. The second consideration has to do with the specific heart rate used during training, and how a runner determines that important number. Let's look at each feature separately.

Building a good aerobic base means training only aerobically. During the base period, almost zero anaerobic workouts (including racing) should be incorporated. Anaerobic activity will jeopardize the efficient development of your aerobic base, so every workout is aerobic. That includes your long run on Sunday, your hilly runs in the park, and any other workouts where you're heavily influenced by other athletes or the terrain.

There may be several reasons why anaerobic workouts can inhibit aerobic base building:

•      Anaerobic training can decrease the number of aerobic muscle fibers, sometimes significantly. This can happen in just a few short weeks of higher heart rate training.
•      The lactic acid produced during anaerobic training may inhibit the aerobic muscle enzymes necessary for building an aerobic base.
•      Anaerobic training raises your respiratory quotient. This means the percentage of energy derived from sugar increases and fat burning decreases. In time, this may force more anaerobic metabolism and less aerobic function.
•      Stress can also inhibit the aerobic system. Stress is nearly synonymous with anaerobic training. Excess stress raises cortisol levels, which ultimately increases insulin levels, inhibiting fat burning and increasing sugar usage. This promotes anaerobic metabolism and inhibits aerobic activity.

Aerobic base training is often the period of training where discipline, dedication, and hard work are most important. Most athletes think these three mental attributes are related to toughing it out, grunting, and training in pain. But it's sometimes harder than that: training properly during the aerobic phase, for many athletes, is the most difficult part of my program. It's the ability to go slower, despite what other athletes are doing and saying.

For the longer running events, 95-98% of racing energy is obtained from the aerobic system. This is another reason I recommend that most training be directed at improving this process. Building a good aerobic base takes about three months. For runners who have lost their competitive edge, have chronic problems (injury, sickness), or cannot lose that extra fat, a longer base - up to six months - can work wonders.

But the question remains: what heart rate do you use for aerobic training? Perhaps the most important feature of training with a heart monitor is knowing which heart rate to use. We're familiar with the old formula: 220 minus your age, multipied by 65-85%. But this method has no basis. Your maximum heart rate is supposed to be represented by 220 minus your age. However, if you've ever pushed yourself on the track or in a race to find your highest heart rate, you may have found, as more than half of the population does, that it is not the same as the formula. Then there's the percentage: which do you use - 65%, 75%, 80%? Rather than guess, you can use a newer formula which is scientifically based. See the insert on the 180 Formula, which establishes the best heart rate for building an aerobic base.

Initially, training at this heart rate induces emotional stress in many athletes. "I just can't train that slow!" is a common comment. But after a short time, not only will you feel better, but your pace will quicken at that same training heart rate. One significant benefit of applying the 180 Formula to your training is the chemical response by the body: production of free radicals is minimal compared to running at heart rates even a little higher. These chemicals can contribute to degenerative problems, inflammation, heart disease, and cancer, not to mention speeding the aging process. By using the 180 Formula, you can run more miles without risking chemical stress.

The 180 Formula
To find your maximum aerobic heart rate:

1.      Subtract your age from 180 (180 - age).
2.      Modify this number by selecting one of the following categories:
o      If you have or are recovering from a major illness (heart disease, any operation, any hospital stay) or on any regular medication, subtract 10.
o      If you have not exercised before, you have exercised but have been injured or are regressing in your running, or you often get colds or flu or have allergies, subtract 5.
o      If you have been exercising for up to two years with no real problems and have not had colds or flu more than once or twice a year, subtract 0.
o      If you have been exercising for more than two years without any problems, making progress in competition without injury, add 5.

For example, if you are 30 years old and fit into category b: 180 - 30 = 150, and 150 - 5 = 145. This is your maximum aerobic heart rate. For efficient base building, you should train at or below this level throughout your base period.

Self-Assessment
A significant benefit of aerobic base building is the ability to run faster at the same effort, that is, at the same aerobic heart rate. And an advantage of using a heart monitor is the ability to objectively measure these improvements using the maximum aerobic function (MAF) test.

The MAF test objectively measures the improvements in aerobic speed during base building. Aerobic speed means you can run faster at the same aerobic heart rate. Traditionally, only anaerobic work is supposed to give you speed. But aerobic improvements will too, and without the wear and tear which often accompanies hard training.

You perform the MAF test on a track with your monitor, running at your maximum aerobic heart rate. Three to five miles provides good data, although a one-mile test still has value. The test is done following an easy warmup.

Below is an actual example of a runner performing the MAF test at a heart rate of 150:

    Mile 1    8:21
    Mile 2    8:27
    Mile 3    8:38
    Mile 4    8:44
    Mile 5    8:49

During any one MAF test, it's normal for your times to get slower; the first mile should always be the fastest, and the last the slowest. If that's not the case, it usually means you have not warmed up enough.

In addition, the test should show faster times as the weeks pass. For example, over four months, we can see the endurance progress in this actual case:
___________ April  May June July
    Mile 1    8:21 8:11 7:57 7:44
    Mile 2    8:27 8:18 8:05 7:52
    Mile 3    8:38 8:26 8:10 7:59
    Mile 4    8:44 8:33 8:17 8:09
    Mile 5    8:49 8:39 8:24 8:15

This improvement usually is only realized during the aerobic base. If you add anaerobic work or racing to your training schedule, your progress will not be as good, or there will be none. Perform the MAF test regularly, throughout the year, and chart your results. I recommend doing the test every three or four weeks.

The greatest benefit of the test is its ability to objectively inform you of an obstacle long before you feel it or see it in the form of an injury or declining performance. If something interferes with your progress - improper training, poor diet, excess stress - you don't want to wait until it's too late. The MAF test tells you, by way of slower times, months before that happens.

Racing
Another important aspect of the heart monitor and MAF test is that the test is predictive of performance. A direct relationship exists between your aerobic pace and your race effort. In other words, as your MAF test improves, so will your racing ability.

Data gathered on hundreds of runners over several years made it evident that the pace a runner could perform at aerobic maximum pace was positively correlated with race pace. The chart below, based on actual data, illustrates the relationship between MAF and 5K race performance.

      MAF         5K        5K
    min/mile  race pace    time

    10:00        7:30     23:18
    9:00         7:00     21:45
    8:30         6:45     20:58
    8:00         6:30     20:12
    7:30         6:00     18:38
    7:00         5:30     17:05
    6:30         5:15     16:19
    6:00         5:00     15:32
    5:45         4:45     14:45
    5:30         4:30     13:59
    5:15         4:20     13:28
    5:00         4:15     13:12

The use of a heart rate monitor to guide you through aerobic base periods will not only help you get healthy, it will also help you perform your best for many years.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jul 7th, 2004, 7:48am by Personal Best Nutrition »  
WWW  
IP Logged
 
john
Guest





Re: Want Speed? Slow Down! by Dr. Philip Maffetone
Reply #1 - Aug 18th, 2004, 12:35pm
 
When doing this MAF test which mile is to be used for tp figure out your 5k time?

By the way I've read this before but I can't find any specifics. I even have some of the dr.s book . Maybe I have the wrong ones.......
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Shea
Senior Member
****
Offline


Forum Operator
Posts: 392

Gender: male
Re: Want Speed? Slow Down! by Dr. Philip Maffetone
Reply #2 - Aug 19th, 2004, 5:51pm
 
John,

Remember, that chart is just an estimate of projected 5K times, but I must say I believe it is fairly accurate. To determine your project 5K time based on the MAF test, use your average time for each mile. For example, let's say you did a 4 mile MAF test and it looked like this:

Mile 1 = 8:30
Mile 2 = 8:45
Mile 3 = 9:00
Mile 4 = 9:15
Total = 35:30

This gives an 8:52 avg per mile pace for the MAF test and a projected 5K race pace of somewhere around 21:30.

Please don't hesitate to drop another post of you have any questions!

-Brian Shea
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
sam_in_oh
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 9
Oh
Gender: male
Re: Want Speed? Slow Down! by Dr. Philip Maffetone
Reply #3 - Aug 21st, 2004, 6:38am
 
What about the bike. According to 180-age, I should be running at 148(which I do), but that makes me feel like I am really pushing it on the bike. So, I have been staying about 10 bpm lower on the bike, is this right?

Sam
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Shea
Senior Member
****
Offline


Forum Operator
Posts: 392

Gender: male
Re: Want Speed? Slow Down! by Dr. Philip Maffetone
Reply #4 - Aug 21st, 2004, 7:59am
 
Sam,

Although I believe wholeheartedly in Maffetone's low HR/aerobic training philosophies, there may be some room for error w/ the 180-age formula. To determine your true aerobic training zones, what I prefer to do is set my max aerobic zone at the top of zone 2 which is usually 20-25 BPM below AT. Once you determine your AT for both your bike & run, subtract 20-25 BPM and use that # as your upper limit in training.

For me, this still ends up almost right on target with the 180-age formula, but for some is may be off by a considerable margin.

-Brian Shea
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Juan
Guest





Re: Want Speed? Slow Down! by Dr. Philip Maffetone
Reply #5 - Sep 7th, 2004, 11:16am
 
Brian thanks for the quick response. I had actually lost the link to this page, that's why I hadn't thanked you. Anyway thanks.

Yes, I do have a bunch of questions.  I'm not sure I understand your way of figuring out maximum heart rate. What do you mean by zone two? I have a sleeping heart rate  of 58. I can't seem to figure out my maximum heart rate. But when doing long repeats I hit about 190 which is the same rate I have at the end of a 5k. Can you give me more specifics on that. Once I figure that out I can then enter those numbers to figure out the rest and my true aerobic zone.

Also when you do begin doing intervals how many should we do? Can I use my heart rate recovery time to determine the most number of reps to do?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Shea
Senior Member
****
Offline


Forum Operator
Posts: 392

Gender: male
Re: Want Speed? Slow Down! by Dr. Philip Maffetone
Reply #6 - Sep 7th, 2004, 3:02pm
 
Juan,

To answer a few of your questions:

1. Zone 2 is a HR guideline when using a scale of 1-5:

1-Recovery
2-Extensive endurance
3-Intensive endurance/muscular endurance
4-Sub-threshold
5a-Super-threshold
5b-Anaerobic endurance
5c-Power

To determine where you are in these zones and what your individual zones are is beyond the scope of what could be included in this post as it takes some time to look at your AT #'s and then determine exactly where your zones are. This is part of what I do for the athletes I coach as it is a little time consuming.

2. Resting and Max HR have little to do with determining your true lactate threshold heart rate (LT or LTHR). I would guess that your LT is probably between 185-190, but that's just a guess.

To find your LTHR) for either the bike or run complete a 30-minute time trial as follows:

Warm-up as you would before a short race and then begin the time trial. Start your heart rate monitor immediately. This should be one with an average heart rate mode. The effort of this time trial should be racelike--give it all you have. Ten minutes into the time trial (20 minutes to go) hit the 'lap' button on your heart rate monitor so that when you finish you have your average heart rate for the last 20 minutes. This number is an approximation of your LTHR. The more times you complete this test and observe your heart rate relative to breathing in workouts, the more refined your LTHR will become.

3. 'When do you begin doing interval work? If your referring to speed work or AT work, the answer is usually NEVER. By interval we are referring to increased-intensity workloads marked by short, but regularly repeated periods of harder exercise interspersed with periods of recovery. Interval work DOES NOT equal LT work. For most of the season I recommend interval work up to high zone 2, but I will not have those intervals approach LT until we stop seeing progress at aerobic training zones. For more information on this, refer to HR and base building questions.

Brian Shea

Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Juan
Guest





Re: Want Speed? Slow Down! by Dr. Philip Maffetone
Reply #7 - Sep 7th, 2004, 5:54pm
 
Could you post a chart of the different training zones?

Does this type of training work as good if I only run 2 mile races and 5k's?


I only race in the fall, are you saying not to do any speed work as long as I continue to improve? I race about every third week. whatb about when I want to peak?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
juan
Guest





Re: Want Speed? Slow Down! by Dr. Philip Maffetone
Reply #8 - Sep 8th, 2004, 8:22am
 
I know you posted the training zones. What I meant was could you post  the associated heart rate zones in relation to a maximum heart rate of 205.

thanks
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Keith
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline



Posts: 5

Re: Want Speed? Slow Down! by Dr. Philip Maffetone
Reply #9 - Sep 8th, 2004, 11:22am
 
Hi Juan,

I don't think you can accurately tell what your AeT and LT are just based on a max heart rate.

The 30 minute time trial that Brian recommends is a good way to find your LT, and your LT is a much better number to extrapolate your AeT than max HR.

I think there are also formulae that predict AeT based on HR reserve, which would be your max HR - resting HR.

Here's a couple of the  Physiological Markers, shamelessly copied from coach gordo's site  ( http://www.byrn.org/gtips/aet_coach.htm )


AeT -- typically close to top of Friel Zn 1 // less fit then lower, more fit then high

AeT -- typically about 60-65% of CP30 for most AG athletes.

AeT -- deepening of breath, see Endurance Essentials

AeT -- first material up tick in lactate during a lactate step test

AeT -- typically 25-40 bpm below LT // the more fit the closer to LT

AeT -- a conversational pace that requires some focus to stay there for extended periods of time, no lactate burning in the legs, no rhythmic breathing (that's tempo/mod-hard).

AeT -- ironman race pace for a well-trained, age group athlete

I'm still not sure I have my AeT nailed down, but I'm getting closer Smiley




Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Juan
Guest





Re: Want Speed? Slow Down! by Dr. Philip Maffetone
Reply #10 - Sep 8th, 2004, 1:27pm
 
Keith --- thank you

I've had to re read and re read.  The terminology is not one that Ive seen before. What is IM?

Whats the difference between AT and AeT? It seems as if it means the same thing.

"typically about 60-65% of CP30 for most AG athletes. "

What's CP30 and AG Athletes?

Most importantly would this type of training be the best for 2miler and 5k runners?

Brian I guess you had already answered most of my questions, but I want to be positively sure. Many Times I think I understand something only to come back and realize I really didn't understand, or it wasn't explained properly.

Again thanks for anything and everything you can help me with.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Shea
Senior Member
****
Offline


Forum Operator
Posts: 392

Gender: male
Re: Want Speed? Slow Down! by Dr. Philip Maffetone
Reply #11 - Sep 8th, 2004, 8:33pm
 
Juan,

To help you w/ a few more pts:

IM = Ironman

AT = Anaerobic Threshold
AeT = Aerobic Threshold

CP30 = Critical Power 30 - This is essentially the avg power output for an athlete over a 30 minute TT (time trial)

AG = age group

Most importantly would this type of training be the best for 2miler and 5k runners?
True anaerobic potential cannot be had unless your aerobic system is fully conditioned. Unfortunately most athletes do not have the patience to let themselves develop their aerobic system and instead pound themselves into the ground on the track for minimal returns.

Also, remember I continue to learn more and more every single day. Don't feel you need to grasp every concept yesterday!

Good luck!

-Brian
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Juan
Guest





Re: Want Speed? Slow Down! by Dr. Philip Maffetone
Reply #12 - Sep 10th, 2004, 4:18pm
 
Thanks guys----------------------------

Ok, I re-read everything and I feel a little more comfortable with my comprehension level. Knowing the definitions to the terms you guys use makes everything easier to understand.

So where can I find this Friel's equation?

Just to clarify, we are supposed to train in "2-Extensive endurance zone" this is the Aerobic Zone or AeT?

"lactate threshold heart rate" what zone would this be? Would it be zone 3 or zone 4?  Also we are to only train in this zone after we stop seeing improvements from training in zone 2?

"Never do any AT or Anaerobic training" Does that still apply to 2 milers and 5kers?

Please answer at your convenience.

One last thing the last my wife ran a 5k in 20:00 with a maximum heart rate of 190 could you please offer a guess as to where you feel her LT would be.

I feel as if this is the kind of training we want to do when we start our spring training and I'm trying to gather as much info as possible.

Again thanks
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Todd
Guest





Re: Want Speed? Slow Down! by Dr. Philip Maffetone
Reply #13 - Oct 25th, 2004, 11:41am
 
Hey just found the forum looks great, congratulations on Kona.  I have a question in regards to expected endurance progress with Dr. Maffetone's methodology.

What is reasonable to expect during a 4 - 6 month period?  If I am training at 10 min/mile, HR 145, what would be reasonable to expect my speed to be at the same heart rate in 4 - 6 months?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Ian
Guest





Re: Want Speed? Slow Down! by Dr. Philip Maffetone
Reply #14 - Nov 8th, 2004, 4:38pm
 
Hi Brian,

First up congrats on Kona,
I've just been reading the article you posted on training with H/R monitors. I've got a few queries that you might or anyone else out there could give me some feedback on.
I have just started incorperatring HR monitor use into my training about 6 weeks ago.
I've been using Dr Gunnar Borg's RPE scale for my training.
I also conducted a Max HR test running from a feature in beginnertriathlete.com , heart rate monitor training for traithletes part 1 and my max H/R only got up to 178 BPM even though I could not run any harder or faster.
I have used the karvonen formula for working out my percentages.
I found my RHR by wearing the monitor to bed and recording my hr over night .
It averages from 35 to 37BPM each night at some stages of the night it gets down to 30BPM.
Now from reading your article about the 180 formula my base building HR should be 150
I find that to get a HR that high I'm running hard and therefore I wouldn't be in a aerobic zone but closer to anerobic?
Could my low resting HR be the reason for this?
Also is it ok to have such a low HR?
And do you think that I would need to conduct some kind of different test to get a true max H/R than the one i did?
Any imformation would be great
Regards
Ian
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print